ProofreadingPal Reviews

At, we believe in truthfulness.
We post all reviews so you see the good and the bad.

4.8 Excellent Rating
5 Star
4 Star
3 Star
2 Star
1 Star

September 26, 2018


Worse than before

To be honest, this experience was worse than the last experience . Because some sentences do not mean what they were meant when they were finished, implying editors did not read the context carefully enough.

June 25, 2018

Ying Shen

need correction instead of just comments/suggestions

In some parts, they only point out the comments and suggestions, but what I really need is how will they correct them or rephrase them, not just comments.

April 28, 2018

Alejandro Cano

I got a 65 on my essay.

I got a 65 on my essay.

March 30, 2018

Abeer Al Hasni

I sent my thesis for master degree and…

I appreciate proofreaders work and efforts with valuable comments but I sent my thesis for master degree and should be in scientific writing. Unfortunately, proofreaders made most of writing with ( I )which is not acceptable in the university.

March 25, 2018


I would have perfered overall feedback

I would have perfered overall feedback, not just sentence by sentence feedback.

March 23, 2018


Not a specialist in the field

I hope that the grammar etc. was correct after the proofreading. I don't know. It was obvious that the proofreader had no idea of the content and context in the paper, which I had hoped for.

February 25, 2018

In Seo La

It they provided track changes

It they provided track changes, it would be better. I've just find memo. Memo was helpful, but since I don't have much time, if they provide clean version and track change version, it would be helpful.

December 6, 2017


It was OK as service

It was OK as service. Missed a couple of typos but it was a long document. Was not as helpful as other more expensive services in improving sentence structure and/or readability.

November 28, 2017

Loran Young

A mixed bag

The first 3,000 word submission would have rated five stars. The subsequent 80,000 word submission was at best marginal, although it did point out redundancy in the narrative. Substantial follow–on editing was necessary before publication. The performance of the sales/contact staff was excellent.

July 5, 2017


Costs are getting too expensive!

Costs are getting too expensive!! I loved the quality of the service; but, it goes really expensive

June 8, 2017

Ana Aguilar

Big difference between reviewers and not a good selection of editors

One reviewer was good, the other was providing just basic, few edits or comments which make think they didn't chose a good editor for a professional technical paper nor a high–school term paper. But, I like it was on time and the comments of the second editor were good and useful

May 23, 2017


Fast and generally well done

Fast and generally well done. Some of the recommendations showed poor understanding of the context of the paper or the paragraph.

May 9, 2017


service could be more consistent

I feel the editors this time is not as good as last time. I do feel there are ups and downs when I used your service. I hope the quality of your service can be a little stable. Or if you have feedback or evaluation system for the editors.

April 1, 2017

wedad Almutairi


I give 3 stars because I had some technical issues with the website more than once but the service in general is good and I recommend it to others.

March 29, 2017

Teresa Pinto

Average work

I have used proofreading for quite some time but these last two projects that I submitted provided were not well done. I went back for review I found some issues: sentences were not corrected that could have been. Too many passive words that were not corrected. The structure of the conclusion paragraph was not corrected. I seek these services specifically for those services. Overall was disappointed with the last two proof–reading reviews.

March 16, 2017

DBA student

First time not happen after 4 uses

Usually a much better review. This one seemed to be a beginner and over use their own writing style. They liked to add the word that in there more than fixing passive voice. Often just seemed to throw in a bubble just to make it look like they did something,

January 31, 2017


So So

I am not seeing too much changes in my resume and doesn't SHINE like the website said it would.

December 26, 2016


Some mistakes of the format

Generally it was okay but I had to look through the paper thoroughly again. The format at some passages was changed weirdly in terms of the font and paragraph styles. Some of the capitalization of the first letter for abbreviation terms were also missing.

November 30, 2016

Zadran Nassery

Good service but expensive

I made an honest mistake of paying of thinking my total cost was in Canadian Dollars. Unfortunately they charged me in USD. 185 CAD for a 24 hour turnout and 3000 words. I tuned down a local company for 100 CAD. The owner called to me and apologized but did not want to refund me anything back. Would be better in the future stating everything is in USD. The document did come finished promptly and it appears properly done. I would use them again next time if I had 1 week to turn it in.

October 3, 2016

David Aslami


PrrofreadingPal couldn't keep the turn around as agreed.

Get a Free Sample

We will get your free sample back in six hours!

Follow us

We proofread documents 24/7 Support 888-833-8385

© 2010 - 2021 ProofreadingPal LLC - All Rights Reserved.


New Customer Discount





Enter your contact details to receive % off coupon code via email.

All fields are required.

E-mail should be valid.