At ProofreadingPal.com, we believe in truthfulness.
We post all reviews so you see the good and the bad.
April 8, 2016
GI Dynamics, Inc.
First–time user. So far, so good.
Our first project sent to Proofreading Pal was a simple one. The entire process of setting up an account and submitting a project was easy and quick. We received the proofed document back when promised and everything went very smoothly. I'd give 5 stars, but it's a little too soon to gush.
March 22, 2016
My cover letter
The edits were done quickly and effectively. I would just anticipate a quicker follow–up reply after sending it for the second review.
March 6, 2016
It was good proofreading.
February 25, 2016
They performed a great job.
February 18, 2016
Service was absolutely great
February 9, 2016
it was great because it showed me every possible mistake
January 18, 2016
Suggested changes acceptable.
Proofreadingpal made reasonable corrections andd I hope this will help in my job search.
January 10, 2016
A great job regarding language despite some misunderstandings of my idea.
Basically it is a very good job regarding language and helps me a lot, but the editor misunderstood my idea at three places. In addition,at one place where my article indicates in the footnote that the emphasis is original, the editor asks whether the emphasis in the quotation is mine or from the source. This confused me.
January 4, 2016
Great service ! Fast and accurate.
December 18, 2015
Glad I asked
It was easy and they were able to get my document back to me in a timely manner. I am definitely using them again
November 18, 2015
The editting service was good.
The revised resume looked good.
November 17, 2015
Great website – but no benefits to loyal customers
I wish that if you can reward your loyal customers (discounts??).
November 15, 2015
A fan M.S.
A great service!
I have used Proofreading Pal at least 10 times with each time having a different editor. 9 times with a rating of excellent with the editor going above and beyond. One of the 10 times the editor still did a good job but did not go above and beyond. My rating is a 4.5.... I recommend this service to all.
November 14, 2015
Good service overall.
I received a good editing on my paper. They followed up with me over the phone to get my feedback. I thought they didn't do enough enough proofreading on my paper, and the person who contacted me resend the paper to me with all the comments (as pdf). I liked their after service and caring for customer's opinion.
October 29, 2015
Good quality service!
October 28, 2015
Fast and professional
I am really happy to use ProofreadingPal service. They are very helpful, fast, and professional. I would recommend this service to my friends
October 10, 2015
Fast service, would prob use again.
I sent a one page letter of recommendation for review. I didn't know whether my letter was edited by two editors. How do you tell? Also no instructions on how to get rid of the bubble comments on the right side of the letter. I haven't used an editing service for years so many some instructions on how to get rid of the comments fr the editor would be great. When I printed by essay all their comments showed up
October 2, 2015
Good value for money
They did a thorough proofreading of my scientific paper and gave very useful suggestions on changing the style of some sentences. This was very beneficial for me as a non–native speaker of English. The review process could be optimized though. I put some of their changes to my document into question, using Microsoft Word's comment feature and sending the document back by e–mail. In his answer, the proofreader sometimes stated that he did not know why his coworkers made certain changes or could not retrace what was my original sentence and what were the changes made by proofreaders. But overall, I believe that my manuscript was greatly improved, and working with ProofreadingPal was worth the investment.
October 1, 2015
Fast Turn–Time & Professional Advise
I benefit from Proofreading Pals quick turn around time as well as their professional advise on sentence structure to insure clarity of message.
September 14, 2015
proof of corporate educational document
The only thing that keeps this from being a 5 would be what I think was a miscommunication – and I take some responsibility for that. I had thought we agreed to not use APA on the reference (per a phone conversation) and keep them consistent in what I had done because of space. But they were all reformatted, and I had to go in and reject all those changes. With 60+ references, it was time–consuming. I should have sent a copy of one of our current self–study documents so the person doing it would have a better understanding of what I needed.
We will get your free sample back in six hours!
WITH COUPON CODE
SAVE UP TO $
All fields are required.
E-mail should be valid.NO THANKS